Top 5 Achievements of the ATP Champions Tour Players

john-mcenroe

 

The ATP Champions Tour brings together the best tennis players of their generation, players who are proving that age need not be a factor in determining the top ranking tennis players in the world today. Best of all, the ATP Champions Tour travels around the world, so that fans everywhere can have the opportunity to see these masters of the game

As the ATP Champions Tour continues its exciting 2012-2013 season, John McEnroe, Pete Sampras, Pat Cash, Mats Wilander and Goran Ivanisevic lead the field in this season’s star-studded lineup. Each of these players has distinguished himself with a career filled with major competition wins.

Here are the top five career achievements for these five players:

[Read more…]

Wimbledon 2012: Federer downs Djokovic, nears top world ranking

For the first time since early in 2010, a men’s Grand Slam trophy will be engraved with a name other than Rafael Nadal or Novak Djokovic, thanks to Roger Federer’s victory over the latter in the 2012 Wimbledon semifinals on Friday.  Djokovic and Nadal had combined to win the last nine major tournaments, going all the way back to the 2010 Australian Open, but Wimbledon 2012 shall feature a new champion.

While Nadal equaled his career-worst performance in a major with a shocking second-round exit, Roger Federer cruised to a four-set victory over Djokovic, knocking out the defending champion with relative ease.  Thanks to Nadal’s early departure, Federer will now be favored to take home his seventh Wimbledon title, which would tie Pete Sampras for the most of all time.

Even more surprising, however, is that Federer’s dominating victory will give him a chance to claim the world’s top ranking for the third time in his career, [Read more…]

Roger Federer’s Window Closing?

rogerfederer832

By Anthony Zilis

In a matter of days, tennis champion Roger Federer may win his 15th Grand Slam tennis tournament, passing Pete Sampras for most all-time.

If he wins his sixth Wimbledon, Federer’s accomplishments will, undoubtedly, vault him into discussions including the top sports champions of all time. Comparisons will be made to Tiger Woods, Bill Russell, Michael Jordan, and, of course, Sampras himself.

But even if Federer wins that gleaming trophy on center court Sunday afternoon at the All-England club, I just can’t bring myself to put him into that pantheon of seemingly invincible, unflappable athletes.

When I envision Federer in that group, my mind takes me back to Sunday, February 1, the day of the Australian Open final. After what had thus far been a great match, I watched in amazement as Rafael Nadal dismantled the three-time champion 6-2 in the fifth set. It was the third time in four Grand Slam finals Nadal had beaten Federer, and it was safe to say that Nadal was now, undisputably, the greatest player in tennis.

As Nadal celebrated his victory, both players were summoned to the podium to accept their first and second place trophies. Federer stepped to the microphone to address the crowd, but after fighting through a few words, the sounds just stopped coming. This man, who has been lauded as one of the classiest athletes in sports, known for his eloquence, if not arrogance, in victory, was speechless.

“God, it’s killing me,” Federer said as he tried to hold back tears. “Maybe I’ll try again later.”

That moment showed it all. Federer knew it and we all knew it– the man who had recently been measured against Tiger Woods had been dethroned in the midst of his prime.

Federer eventually came back up to the microphone, and said all of the things he should have said in the first place. But the message had been sent.

This wasn’t a one-match wonder. Nadal had done it on all surfaces. First his favorite, clay, then on Federer’s favorite, grass, and then finally on what had been his Achilles’ heel, the hard court.

Nadal was, inarguably, the better player.

federer230607_468x577

Imagine Woods, in his prime, being beaten consistently by some young hotshot, or Jordan being overtaken by some younger player while he wore a Bulls uniform. Their mystique just wouldn’t have been the same.

As tears streamed down Federer’s face, he surely knew that his legacy had been changed forever.

Yes, he won the French Open, completing the career slam, an amazing feat even with an injured Nadal out in the quarterfinals. And yes, he may win another Wimbledon, with Nadal out. He’ll have won the most Grand Slams ever and he should be known as one of the greatest tennis players of all time.

But in order to get back into the conversation for the greatest champion of all-time, Federer will have to prove, unmistakably, that he is the best of his era. In my eyes, the only way he can do that is to beat a healthy Nadal consistently in Grand Slam finals.

And with a tennis players’ shelf life, that’s going to be difficult. Consider – Sampras turned 29 shortly before the 2000 US Open, when he won his second-to-last Grand Slam championship. Federer will turn 28 before this year’s US Open.

His window may be closing more swiftly than it seems.

If he doesn’t show he can beat Nadal, he’ll be known as a great tennis player. But to be known as one of the greatest champions, an athlete has to uphold nearly impossible standards.    That athlete must transcend his sport, while being the best in it.

That athlete may just be a young lefty from Spain.