The Present and Future of Sports Media


bilas.jpgnix.bmp

By the TSB Staff

On this Labor weekend, The Sports Bank staff discusses the industry within which they labor. Mariotti’s leaving the newspaper industry and subsequent controversial comments made us think about where the sports media industry is and where it’s going.
 

PAUL M. BANKS:

Everyone knows that newspapers are going the way of the Wooly Mammoth, but I’m more interested in how bloggers and blogging are no longer considered inferior entities. The idea that bloggers are just losers who “live in their parents’ basement” is so 2006. Today, reporters in all sports mediums blog, and as more newspaper reporters accept contract buyouts, they’ll all be bloggers someday! Of course, we have a long way to go in terms of understanding which blogs have credibility and which ones are just useless. Look at websites authored by people posting their real names with a clear and in-depth “About” page identifying the site’s background and credentials, because as Marshall McLuhan said, “the medium is the message;” updated for Web 2.0 in the Look at Me Generation, I’d say “the user is the content.” Especially in the case of that infamous guy named Ballz Deep who comments on Deadspin.
 

DAVID K.:

I think Mariotti’s national exposure as Woody Paige’s pretend arch-nemesis on “Around the Horn” definitely played a part in Mariotti fleeing the newspaper business, and who can blame him?  I have a college friend who is a sports editor at a smaller newspaper in northwestern Wisconsin who admittedly jokes how he works in an industry that will likely be extinct in 25 years.  And it’s true.  We live in a world where news is all about immediacy.  Why wait to read what happened yesterday in the newspaper when you can visit a web-site that keeps you up-to-date every minute with stories and events that are currently breaking.  It makes sense.  How many people do you know who spend half their work day surfing the web or immediately turn to one of the many major sports sites when they hear about a breaking sports story?

Even in the television news business, sports departments are experiencing a dramatic overhaul.  Major local affiliates continue to downsize their sports staffs, partly because of the struggling economy and partly because of the other avenues people use to acquire their sports information.  Recently the NBC affiliate in Green Bay, where 90% of their news revolves around the Packers (and we all know the NFL is king of revenue among sports leagues), eliminated their entire sports team.  This seems to be a continuing trend in the business.

bilas.jpg 
 

JEREMY ZULEGER:

Radio has seen erosion. 95% of all Americans used to listen to radio regularly. Those numbers have fallen to about 88% over the last 10 years. In that same time period newspaper subscriptions have fallen more than 50%. The stories you may hear about the demise of radio are mostly about declining revenues, but also pure media hype. Revenue has fallen along with revenue from print, TV, cable and most major media while online is growing. But unlike most other major media, radio still has roughly a 40% profit margin… for publicly traded entities that number is HUGE.

nix.bmp

SARAH SPAIN:

The decline of the newspaper world cannot be ignored or denied. In big cities like Chicago and New York young people often note that they only read the paper on the subway or the bus. Newer generations consider the internet their first choice for sports and entertainment news and rarely pick up a newspaper if they’ve got the web right at their fingertips. Older generations still support print media, but their opinions are becoming less and less relevant as they age out of the target market. It will be interesting to see the way the media grows in new and different ways as the print sector continues to become more and more obsolete.

erinandrewsespys1.jpg
 

ANDY WEISE:

I, myself am evidence in the decline of newspapers and television production staff. As a journalism graduate, I was given a choice: stay in a small market or go back home (Minneapolis/St. Paul area) and leave journalism behind. I choose the latter because of friends and family basically.

In Minnesota, one of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune’s Viking beat writers Kevin Siefert recently took the helm of the ESPN North Blog. While I think Siefert is clearly missed at the Star Trib, he jumped at the opportunity to join ESPN because he will never have to worry about a job there, unless he under performs. Another guy a few years back, Dan Barreiro, made the transition from the top columnist at the Star-Trib to full time radio host, 4-7 “Bumper to Bumper” on KFAN Sports Radio station. He’s got a great gig and left before the paper was even cutting people.

In a day where you constantly read about budget cuts in the newsroom, it’s very alarming and sad. I think the paper will always be around, but the blog is taking over. All newspaper sportswriters here in Minnesota now have blogs. In fact, it’s only a matter of time before the St. Paul Pioneer Press closes up shop. That paper, which competes head on with the Star Trib, has been shrinking for quite some time. Some days, the sports and local sections are barely even 6 pages.
 

PETER CHRISTIAN:

In addition to what Andy said, we both come from a school (and a department) that was completely unwilling to change their views and teachings for the changing journalism world. I still remember my arguments with the department head who required me to take a course that was effectively learning how to write for a newspaper even though in my other broadcast courses were teaching that writing in that style was not only flawed, but fatal. I do know that a portion of online writing was introduced to the newspaper course (although the style of writing remained the same, which was a definite error by the department/school’s brass). 

However, I think that coupled with the fact that more and more people were getting their news from other better updated sources (i.e. the internet, 24 hour cable news) the newspaper brass had a choice to make in order to keep their industry relevant. Instead they decided to stand pat for a few years and do nothing. When they finally realized that the internet was something to embrace rather than shun, it was too late and they were behind the eight ball.

Another glaring issue that the print media has been facing for decades (long before their medium was irrelevant) was the fact that the style of writing thought to be the “newspaper way” has been flawed for years. The quality of the writing has deteriorated to a string of horrible sentences with little to no structure that the writer could cover up with an above average vocabulary. Add in the fact that the corporations owning the newspapers were beginning to push agendas (political or otherwise) on their writers and it was a recipe for disaster.

Comments

  1. paulmbanks says:

    Labor Day weekend. perfect time for this story

  2. Marie says:

    One problem with the demise of major newspapers is the growing insularity of our news. Only a couple of papers continue to support reporters sent to foreign countries to get a first hand look at what is happening around the world. Americans have never been informed on world affairs , let alone world geography and this doesn’t help. Who is going to support the gathering of this information? Will we depend on foreign bloggers? As you already brought up who is fact checking the bloggers? Papers depend on AP releases and as we recently learned some of the people writing these releases have a political bias.
    And the trend to more local news – is that a good direction for an informed citizenry in a global economy? Do people need to know why they’ve lost their jobs to the south, then Mexico, then China and soon to Laos?
    The comment that we want to know now, not wait to read about events the next day is true and reasonable, but are we willing to read about the interpretation of those events and consider the consequences of those events? Do we get that in the blogs?

  3. I understand that newspapers are in big trouble. I also understand that the internet is becoming a major source of how people get their news. However, I still enjoy the feeling of holding the paper in my hand as I start from the back of the Chicago Sun Times and move my way upward. I think there will always be a need for newspapers because people enjoy this very feeling.

  4. I understand that newspapers are in big trouble. I also understand that the internet is becoming a major source of how people get their news. However, I still enjoy the feeling of holding the paper in my hand as I start from the back of the Chicago Sun Times and move my way upward. I think there will always be a need for newspapers because people enjoy this very feeling.

  5. paulmbanks says:

    ANother issue is…who’s going to do the actual reporting that the websites dpeend on? the AP? where’s the local flavor going to come from? How is the news going to be gathered, if newspapers continue to offer contract buyouts to all their writers?

  6. e says:

    Always going to come down to accreditation regardless.

    There is something about the feel of the printed paper, just as we can download a book on audio or read it online if we wish, it doesn’t take away the sensation of holding the words in one’s hands.

    Media is always changing venues. This will always be true. Last I checked, there is still an AM Band. Who knew?

Speak Your Mind

*