<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Mock Draft 2nd Round 2-9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/</link>
	<description>&#34;Your most valuable option for Midwest sports&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulmbanks</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-122172</link>
		<dc:creator>paulmbanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsbank.net/?p=16254#comment-122172</guid>
		<description>I see your point, and it&#039;s quite valid. But, given how awful their RBs are now, why not start over? tell me why they shouldn&#039;t take a new a running back to start over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point, and it&#8217;s quite valid. But, given how awful their RBs are now, why not start over? tell me why they shouldn&#8217;t take a new a running back to start over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tulsajim</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-122086</link>
		<dc:creator>tulsajim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsbank.net/?p=16254#comment-122086</guid>
		<description>drafting rb best makes no sense, just like all the other backs the browns have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drafting rb best makes no sense, just like all the other backs the browns have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulmbanks</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-122083</link>
		<dc:creator>paulmbanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsbank.net/?p=16254#comment-122083</guid>
		<description>I think Decker might fall to round 3-4. The deepest positions in this draft are definitely DE and OT, but I think you&#039;re right- I&#039;ll think they&#039;ll pass over those positions, and go for most pressing need with their high picks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Decker might fall to round 3-4. The deepest positions in this draft are definitely DE and OT, but I think you&#8217;re right- I&#8217;ll think they&#8217;ll pass over those positions, and go for most pressing need with their high picks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike J</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-122055</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsbank.net/?p=16254#comment-122055</guid>
		<description>*Decker in rd. 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Decker in rd. 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike J</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsbank.net/nfl-mock-drafts/nfl-mock-draft-2nd-round-2-9/comment-page-1/#comment-122054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsbank.net/?p=16254#comment-122054</guid>
		<description>OK, here&#039;s the deal: if Tampa takes Berry, they have to come back rd. 2 &amp; take a DT--maybe Jones as you posit. I think they need a guard  maybe more than a DE, &amp;  more than  a tackle as they can be status quo at that spot in 2010.But they need a WR (or two) more than any of these latter positions--Decker in rd. 2 would be adequate, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here&#8217;s the deal: if Tampa takes Berry, they have to come back rd. 2 &amp; take a DT&#8211;maybe Jones as you posit. I think they need a guard  maybe more than a DE, &amp;  more than  a tackle as they can be status quo at that spot in 2010.But they need a WR (or two) more than any of these latter positions&#8211;Decker in rd. 2 would be adequate, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 333/341 objects using apc

Served from: www.thesportsbank.net @ 2012-02-09 03:53:52 -->
