#36 Illinois Fighting Illini: College Basketball 111 in 111


illini cheerleaders

Welcome to The Sports Bank’s second annual college basketball season preview series.  Last year we looked at 99 teams in 99 days.  This year, we are being slightly more aggressive and expanding to 111 teams in 111 days.  We will rank the 74 power conference teams and top 37 mid-majors in reverse power ranking order.  We’ll break down rosters, non-conference schedules, and pick a player to watch for each team.

“Addition by subtraction” might be the ideal phrase to apply to the Illinois Fighting Illini this season.  With four inconsistent seniors graduating and Jereme Richmond’s idiotic decision to enter the NBA Draft, Bruce Weber loses five of his top seven players from last season.  However, the Illini may actually be better off without them.

ILLINOIS FIGHTING ILLINI
Last Season: T-4th, 9-9 in Big Ten, 20-14 overall
Predicted Big Ten Finish: 5th

Projected Depth Chart
C: Meyers Leonard (So)/Nnanna Egwu (Fr)
PF: Tyler Griffey (Jr)/Mike Shaw (Fr)/Ibby Djimde (Fr)
G: D.J. Richardson (Jr)/Myke Henry (Fr)/Devin Langford (Fr)
G: Brandon Paul (Jr)/Crandall Head (So)
PG: Sam Maniscalco (Sr)/Joseph Bertrand (So)/Tracy Abrams (Fr)

Gone: PG-Demetri McCamey, PF-Mike Davis, C-Mike Tisdale, SF-Bill Cole, SF-Jereme Richmond

2011-2012 Outlook:
For Illinois to reach their potential, junior guards D.J. Richardson and Brandon Paul will have to have step out from behind the shadows and embrace the spotlight.  Richardson had a somewhat disappointing sophomore campaign after being named Big Ten Freshman of the Year.  He relies more on his jump shot while Paul has deceptive athleticism and will probably see some time handling the point.  The duo must provide leadership and become the top scoring options.

Bradley transfer Sam Maniscalco figures to step into the starting line-up to give the Illini a three-guard look.  His addition was a blessing as he can bring stability and experience to the point guard position; something Illinois was lacking prior to his arrival.

meyers leonard illinois

Another vital aspect to the Illini’s success will be the development of seven-footer Meyers Leonard.  He had an extremely underwhelming freshman season, often looking lost on the floor and failing to match up physically with his opponents.  If there is a ray of light for Leonard, it is that he had a solid summer for the U.S. U-19 team in Latvia.  Upside, upside, upside has been the talk surrounding him.  With Tisdale and Davis gone, now is time for Leonard to tap into that upside and start becoming a true force in the middle.

The fifth starting spot will likely go to Tyler Griffey at the beginning of the season but one of the talented freshmen frontcourt players could end up taking that spot.  Griffey played sparingly a year ago but does bring some physicality to the post and also has three-point range.

There is a lot of talent but even more inexperience on the bench with two sophomores and six freshmen.  Crandall Head and Joseph Bertrand are the sophomores and will provide depth at guard along with freshman Tracy Abrams who figures to be the point guard of the future.  Myke Henry and Devin Langford are both athletic wings capable of playing multiple positions.  Mike Shaw, Nnanna Egwu, and Ibby Djimde will compete for minutes down low.  Shaw is an inside/outside threat while Egwu relies on his length and athleticism and Djimde his strength.

I’m not sold on Illinois and think this is a fairly high ranking for a team with such tremendous inexperience.  And let’s be honest; Bruce Weber has not exactly proven his ability to coach up a team considering the Illini have a 44-44 conference record and only one NCAA Tournament victory in the past five seasons (when Weber was coaching his own guys and not in charge of Bill Self’s leftovers.)

With that being said, there is a ton of talent on the team and the Big Ten is not as top heavy as it has been the past couple seasons.  If Illinois is able to figure it out unlike the Illini squads of recent years, there is a fairly high ceiling to what they can accomplish.

Player to Watch: Sam Maniscalco
Maniscalco only appeared in four games at Bradley last season before missing the rest of the year with an ankle injury.  Since he graduated, it allowed him the opportunity to transfer to another school without having to sit out any games.  As the only senior on the team, it will be integral for Maniscalco to balance being the new guy and the elder statesman.

Key Non-Conference Games:
11/22 vs. Richmond (Cancun Challenge)
11/23 vs. Rutgers/Illinois State (Cancun Challenge)
11/29 at Maryland (Big Ten/ACC Challenge)
12/3 vs. Gonzaga
12/7 vs. St. Bonaventure
12/17 vs. UNLV (in Chicago)
12/22 vs. Missouri (in St. Louis)

OTHER 111 IN 111′S:
#37 Oregon Ducks
#38 Wichita State Shockers
#39 Cal Golden Bears
#40 Belmont Bruins
#41 Mississippi State Bulldogs
#42 Saint Mary’s Gaels
#43 Purdue Boilermakers
#44 BYU Cougars
#45 Kansas State Wildcats
#46 West Virginia Mountaineers
#47 Virginia Cavaliers
#48 George Mason Patriots
#49 Old Dominion Monarchs

#50 VCU Rams
#51 Kent State Golden Flashes
#52 Arkansas Razorbacks
#53 St. John’s Red Storm
#54 Northwestern Wildcats
#55 Georgetown Hoyas
#56 Miami Hurricanes
#57 Nevada Wolfpack
#58 Detroit Titans
#59 UCF Knights
#60 Long Beach State 49ers
#61 Virginia Tech Hokies
#62 Clemson Tigers
#63 New Mexico State Aggies
#64 Tennessee Volunteers
#65 Iona Gaels
#66 Murray State Racers
#67 N.C. State Wolfpack
#68 Fairfield Stags
#69 George Washingon Colonials
#70 Indiana State Sycamores
#71 Oklahoma State Cowboys
#72 Indiana Hoosiers
#73 UAB Blazers
#74 Iowa State Cyclones
#75 Creighton Bluejays
#76 USC Trojans
#77 Weber State Wildcats
#78 Maryland Terrapins
#79 Tulsa Golden Hurricane
#80 Minnesota Golden Gophers
#81 Western Michigan Broncos
#82 Dayton Flyers
#83 Stanford Cardinal
#84 Yale Bulldogs

#85 Georgia Bulldogs
#86 Rutgers Scarlet Knights
#87 Richmond Spiders
#88 Ball State Cardinals
#89 Utah State Aggies
#90 Arizona State Sun Devils
#91 Marshall Thundering Herd
#92 Oregon State Beavers
#93 Washington State Cougars
#94 Iowa Hawkeyes
#95 Ole Miss Rebels
#96 Nebraska Cornhuskers
#97 Oklahoma Sooners
#98 South Florida Bulls
#99 LSU Tigers
#100 Colorado Buffaloes
#101 DePaul Blue Demons
#102 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
#103 Wake Forest Demon Deacons
#104 Seton Hall Pirates
#105 Providence Friars
#106 Auburn Tigers
#107 South Carolina Gamecocks
#108 Texas Tech Red Raiders
#109 Penn State Nittany Lions
#110 Boston College Eagles
#111 Utah Utes

David Kay is a senior feature NBA Draft, NBA, and college basketball writer for the Sports Bank.  He also heads up the NBA and college basketball material at Walter Football.com and is a former contributor at The Washington Times Communities.  David has appeared on numerous national radio programs spanning from Cleveland to New Orleans to Honolulu.  He also had the most accurate 2011 NBA Mock Draft on the web.

You can follow him on Twitter at DavidKay_TSB.

Comments

  1. paulmbanks says:

    The best case scenario we could hope for is a repeat of the 08-09 team, when they came out of nowhere when expectations were minimal following the previous season which set a school record for losses.

    that’s when the infamous class (mccamey, davis, tisdale) were sophomores, and I would venture to say they would peak that season. it’s why I hate them so much. they didn’t grow as juniors and seniors. it’s not their fault that there was LITERALLY no class both both behind them and ahead of them. but it kind of is their fault when you consider 2/3 thought they were going to the NBA. If you’re going to play in the league, you need to show us more than that.

    I knew Davis wasn’t going league after his junior yr offseason. I knew McCamey wasn’t going league after the home game vs Pur sr year.

    and tisdale is a 7’1′ shooting guard, always will be. addition by subtraction indeed. they could surprise this season

  2. paulmbanks says:

    I’m cool with you ranking them here. if you had them in the hig 20s or the low 40s I would agree with that too.

    like you said, the big ten so down this year that they’ll have more chances at free wins then you would expect. I think it breaks down like this

    contenders

    1. osu
    2, wisc

    a step down but solid

    3. mich

    slightly above average

    4. msu
    5. ill

    bubble at best
    6. pur
    7 minn

    not very good

    8. indiana
    9. northwestern

    hurtin

    10. penn state
    11. iowa
    12. nebraska

Speak Your Mind